I hope this is not the first time someone notes the bit of ugliness in repeatable definition.
Let's ask KK to fix the thing
Let's ask KK to fix the thing
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_e_smile.gif)
<cms:editable type='text' label='Description' >Here is a default description </cms:editable>
The main wrapper already supports both title and description (as seen in the image). Did you mean something else?Support Title and Desc for repeatable field